托福写作28分是怎么做到的

这位同学你好！
托福的分数分为四个档次，18分以下，19-22，23-25，25以上。
各档次的分数解读是这样的：
18分以下，独立写作有严重的语法错误，基本词不达意；综合写作基本没能写出三个听力要点中的任何一个要点。

19-22：独立写作基本能让读者看懂作者要表达的意思，字数够，有结构，但是例证对于观点的支持度不够，说白了就是例子的说服力很弱，至于19还是22，主要还是在这个基础上的语法错误多少决定。综合写作可以听出2个到3个要点，但是描述得不够清晰，细节缺失。

23-25：独立写作已经复合了考试大纲里的大部分要求，主要问题出现在句型结构多样性和词汇多样性。综合写作主要是细节有缺失。

25分以上：独立写作文笔流畅，具有很强的语法功底，体现出语言的多样性和一些很地道的书面表达，词汇丰富。综合写作听力内容的转述基本完整。

所以，你说的28分就是属于最后一种情况，为了更好的给你说明，我把一名最后考试28分的学员的文章粘在这里供你参考，但是请注意！！！！不是每个得28分的学员都写得一样，“写无定法”语言能力提升才是得分王道，希望能够帮到你。
综合写作范文：
Both the article and the professor address the same topic about the uses of electronic medical record systems. The article puts forward that storing patients' medical records in electronic databases has several advantages over traditional paper-based record keeping. However, professor hold opposite opinion towards this statement by providing three sub-points.
Firstly, the author claims that the use of electronic records can help reduce costs by saving money on storing and transferring medical records. Moreover, doctors will be able to access the records and use them from everywhere without copying, faxing or transporting paper records from one location to another. On the contrary, the professor refutes the argument by saying that most doctors of hospitals with electronic medical record systems are still using paper records for emergency or legal uses. So they still have to pay for paper, which means that the system cannot help reducing costs.
Secondly, the professor disapproves of the argument in the article that electronic medical records will help doctors reduce the chances of medical errors caused by illegible handwriting, improper transcriptions of data, or nonstandard organization of paper records. Instead, she explains that since doctors still use paper-based materials and write on them, staffs who transfer information on paper to electronic records still have to interpret what the doctor had written. However, in this process, it is possible that poor handwriting is misinterpreted.
Thirdly, in order to refute the view in the reading passage that electronic medical records can aid medical research by collecting large amounts of data from records, which is impossible before because of thousands of patients' paper records, the professor argues that the access to use patients' records are strictly limited by privacy laws of United States. If researchers need these materials, they will have to follow strict procedures to apply for the permissions. However, patients will be able to block any permissions to access their records, which makes impossible for researchers to use their records.
独立写作范文：
The best way to improve quality of education is to increase the teachers’ salaries.
Nowadays, people are more concerned about whether should schools increase the teachers’ salaries in order to improve quality of education. As teachers need money, many people claim that the best way to improve quality of education is to increase the teacher’s salaries. However, the others hold the opposite views because they believe that since there are some teachers who pay little attention to their salaries, schools ought to spend money in enhancing facilities in school and laboratories and teachers will love this new equipment. From my perspective, it is not wise to only take account of one side of this issue. Actually, whether the best way to improve quality of education is to increase teachers’ salaries depends on which aspect teachers attach great importance to.
It is true that for those teachers who are under great finance pressure and need money, increasing their salaries is a good way to encourage them enhance the quality of their teaching. For instance, my mathematics teacher once told me his experience. When he graduated from his university, similar to many young outsiders in metropolis, he stayed in a small and undeveloped country. The unprosperous cold city greeted him with lots of hardship. For one thing, his living expense, a big pressure under him, was very high in there. To be specific, he spent around sixty thousand dollars in paying the house. Also, he had to pay for the electricity, water fee. Therefore, he was under much pressure. During that time, the president of the school told him that he would earn a higher salary, but he must devote more time in teaching and improve the quality of his teaching. He then accepted with much enthusiasm, feeling inspired and wanting to teach his students more and to be a good teacher.
However, never should we be blind to the fact that increasing salaries will not make teachers who prefer other things such as experiments and researches and who come from affluent backgrounds felt obliged to improve their quality of education. My brother, a chemistry teacher who show little interest in earning money, can be served as a vivid example. He is always busy. As at least three hours’ practicing in the laboratory tops his plans, he doesn’t consider other things at all. Even at the weekend, he has to use computer center to write his papers. Limited by these old art facilities, he hopes the university to buy new devices. Moreover, many facilities in his university are too old to use and if university update them, he will be very happy and improve his quality of teaching.
In brief, I disagree with this statements that the best way to improve quality of education is to increase the teachers’ salaries simply because it ignores one side of this issue.
祝：考试顺利！

你可以留邮箱，我让我们写作老师给你建议~